Working Academic Paper

WORKING PAPER

When Altruism Becomes Coercion

Professional Virtue and Institutional Exploitation in Medicine

Central inquiry

When does institutional reliance on clinician altruism cease to represent professional virtue and instead become a mechanism of exploitation or coercion?

Overview

Medicine asks a great deal of the people who practice it, and much of what it asks is asked in the language of virtue. Clinicians are expected to stay late, absorb shortfalls, and carry the difference between what an institution provides and what a patient needs. Understood one way, this is professionalism. Understood another way, it is a budget line.

This paper examines the point at which an institution stops relying on altruism as a moral good practiced by individuals and begins depending on it as a structural input — something planned for, forecast, and quietly required. The distinction matters because the vocabulary does not change when the underlying relationship does.

Sections in development: the moral structure of professional obligation; institutional dependence and the economics of goodwill; consent, coercion, and the asymmetry of exit; what a non-exploitative account of professional virtue would require.

Questions

  • What distinguishes a virtue freely practiced from a virtue institutionally required?
  • Can consent be meaningful where refusal carries professional or moral penalty?
  • What does a profession owe practitioners whose ethics it depends upon?

Themes

  • professional virtue
  • institutional ethics
  • coercion
  • moral injury
  • obligation

Working notes

Notes tied to this project will appear here as they are written. Broader working notes live in the Notebook.